Journal Home
Search for

Volume 26, Issue 3, Pages 199-209 (May 2004)


View previous. 5 of 19 View next.

The impact of a pharmacist intervention on 6-month outcomes in depressed primary care patients

David A Adler, M.D.abcCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Kathleen M Bungay, Pharm.D.ab, Ira B Wilson, M.D., M.Sc.ab, Yu Pei, M.P.A.a, Stacey Supran, M.Sc.a, Emily Peckham, B.S.a, Diane J Cynn, B.A.a, William H Rogers, Ph.D.a

Received 31 January 2003; accepted 12 August 2003.

Abstract 

The object of the study was to evaluate outcomes of a randomized clinical trial (RCT) of a pharmacist intervention for depressed patients in primary care (PC). We report antidepressant (AD) use and depression severity outcomes at 6-months. The RCT was conducted between 1998 and 2000 in 9 eastern Massachusetts PC practices. We studied 533 patients with major depression and/or dysthymia as determined by a screening test done at the time of a routine PC office visit. The majority of participants had recurrent depressive episodes (63.5% with ≥4 lifetime episodes), and 49.5% were taking AD medications at enrollment. Consultation in person and by telephone was performed by a clinical pharmacist who assisted the primary care practitioner (PCP) and patient in medication choice, dose, and regimen, in accordance with AHCPR depression guidelines. Six-month AD use rates for intervention patients exceeded controls (57.5% vs. 46.2%, P = .03). Furthermore, the intervention was effective in improving AD use rates for patients not on ADs at enrollment (32.3% vs. 10.9%, P = .001). The pharmacist intervention proved equally effective in subgroups traditionally considered difficult to treat: those with chronic depression and dysthymia. Patients taking ADs had better modified Beck Depression Inventory (mBDI) outcomes than patients not taking ADs, (−6.3 points change, vs. −2.8, P = .01) but the outcome differences between intervention and control patients were not statistically significant (17.7 BDI points vs. 19.4 BDI points, P = .16). Pharmacists significantly improved rates of AD use in PC patients, especially for those not on ADs at enrollment, but outcome differences were too small to be statistically significant. Difficult-to-treat subgroups may benefit from pharmacists' care.

a Department of Medicine, The Health Institute, Division of Clinical Care Research, (T-NEMC), Boston, MA, USA

b Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA

c Department of Psychiatry, Tufts-New England Medical Center (T-NEMC), Boston, MA, USA

Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +1-617-636-8755; fax: +1-617-636-8351.

 Funding Source: Grant MH56214 from the National Institute of Mental Health, Rockville, MD

PII: S0163-8343(03)00116-6

doi:10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2003.08.005


View previous. 5 of 19 View next.