Journal Home
Search for

Volume 26, Issue 5, Pages 384-389 (September 2004)


View previous. 14 of 14

A prospective study to compare three depression screening tools in patients who are terminally ill

Mari Lloyd-Williams, MD,FRCP, MRCGP, MMedSciaCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Mick Dennis, MRCPsych,MDb, Fiona Taylor, BScc

Received 21 November 2003; accepted 6 April 2004.

Abstract 

Depression is a significant symptom for approximately one in four palliative care patients. This study investigates the performance of three screening tools. Patients were asked to verbally rate their mood on a scale of 0–10; to respond “yes” or “no” to the question “Are you depressed?,” and to complete the Edinburgh depression scale. They were also interviewed using a semi-structured clinical interview according to DSM-IV criteria. Complete data was available for 74 patients. For the single question, a “yes” answer had a sensitivity of 55% and specificity 74%. The Edinburgh depression scale at a cut-off point of ≥13 had a sensitivity of 70% and specificity of 80%. The verbal mood item with a cut-off point of ≥3 had a sensitivity of 80% and specificity of 43%. The Edinburgh depression scale proved to be the most reliable instrument for detecting clinical depression in palliative care patients.

a Department of Primary Care, University of Liverpool Medical School, Harrison Hughes Building, Liverpool L69 3GB, UK

b Department of Psychiatry, University of Leicester, Leicester General Hospital, Leicester LE5 4PW, UK

c LOROS Hospice, Groby Road, Leicester LE3 9QE, UK

Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +44-151-794-5655; fax: +44-151-794-4907.

PII: S0163-8343(04)00059-3

doi:10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2004.04.002


View previous. 14 of 14