General Hospital Psychiatry
Volume 32, Issue 4 , Pages 345-359, July 2010

The Patient Health Questionnaire Somatic, Anxiety, and Depressive Symptom Scales: a systematic review

  • Kurt Kroenke, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • From Regenstrief Institute, Inc. and the Department of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +1 317 630 7447; fax: +1 317 630 6611.
  • ,
  • Robert L. Spitzer, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Biometrics Research Department, New York State Psychiatric Institute and Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA
  • ,
  • Janet B.W. Williams, D.S.W.

      Affiliations

    • Biometrics Research Department, New York State Psychiatric Institute and Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA
  • ,
  • Bernd Löwe, M.D., Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf and Schön Klinik, Hamburg-Eilbek, Germany

Received 4 October 2009; accepted 9 March 2010. published online 10 May 2010.

Abstract 

Background

Depression, anxiety and somatization are the most common mental disorders in primary care as well as medical specialty populations; each is present in at least 5–10% of patients and frequently comorbid with one another. An efficient means for measuring and monitoring all three conditions would be desirable.

Methods

Evidence regarding the psychometric and pragmatic characteristics of the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ)-9 depression, generalized anxiety disorder (GAD)-7 anxiety and PHQ-15 somatic symptom scales are synthesized from two sources: (1) four multisite cross-sectional studies (three conducted in primary care and one in obstetric-gynecology practices) comprising 9740 patients, and (2) key studies from the literature that have studied these scales.

Results

The PHQ-9 and its abbreviated eight-item (PHQ-8) and two-item (PHQ-2) versions have good sensitivity and specificity for detecting depressive disorders. Likewise, the GAD-7 and its abbreviated two-item (GAD-2) version have good operating characteristics for detecting generalized anxiety, panic, social anxiety and post-traumatic stress disorder. The optimal cutpoint is ≥10 on the parent scales (PHQ-9 and GAD-7) and ≥3 on the ultra-brief versions (PHQ-2 and GAD-2). The PHQ-15 is equal or superior to other brief measures for assessing somatic symptoms and screening for somatoform disorders. Cutpoints of 5, 10 and 15 represent mild, moderate and severe symptom levels on all three scales. Sensitivity to change is well-established for the PHQ-9 and emerging albeit not yet definitive for the GAD-7 and PHQ-15.

Conclusions

The PHQ-9, GAD-7 and PHQ-15 are brief well-validated measures for detecting and monitoring depression, anxiety and somatization.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0163-8343(10)00056-3

doi:10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2010.03.006

General Hospital Psychiatry
Volume 32, Issue 4 , Pages 345-359, July 2010