General Hospital Psychiatry
Volume 18, Supplement 6 , Pages 70-77, November 1996

Assessment and follow-up of alcohol-dependent liver transplantation patients a clinical cohort

  • Ronald A. Tringali, R.N., M.S.

      Affiliations

    • The Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
  • ,
  • Paula T. Trzepacz, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress reprint requests to: Dr. Paula T. Trzepacz, Dept. of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, University of Mississippi Medical Center, 2500 N. State St., Jackson, MS 39216.
    • Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
  • ,
  • Andrea DiMartini, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
  • ,
  • Mary Amanda Dew, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
    • Department of Epidemiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA

Abstract 

We describe pretransplantation characteristics of 103 consecutive alcoholic cirrhotics who underwent orthotopic liver transplantation over a 28-month period, and follow-up characteristics for 58 of 82 survivors. We examined whether certain pretransplantation psychiatric and demographic variables predicted posttransplantation outcomes. Patients who were sober ⩽6 months and those who died after transplantation had longer transplant hospital stays, suggesting that physiological compromise may predict posttransplant course. Using survival analyses because of variable follow-up intervals, only age over 50 years and index hospital stays greater than 1 month showed statistical trends toward predicting shorter posttransplant survival duration. Neither pretransplant sobriety, gender, nor duration of pretransplant heavy drinking predicted posttransplant survival duration. No variable, including pre-operative sobriety ⩽6 months or attendance at alcohol rehabilitation peritransplant, predicted relapse except for female gender and pretransplant unemployment, in which cases the relapse rate was doubled. Our relapse rate of 21% is comparable to recidivism rates reported from other centers and for the general alcoholic population. These findings, several of which are contrary to general beliefs, continue to challenge our presumed predictive variables in selecting the best candidates for liver transplantation.

No full text is available. To read the body of this article, please view the PDF online.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Psychosomatic Medicine, Atlanta, October 1991 and at Psychiatric Psychosocial, and Ethical Issues in Organ Transplantation Conference, Pittsburgh, May 1992.

PII: S0163-8343(96)00083-7

General Hospital Psychiatry
Volume 18, Supplement 6 , Pages 70-77, November 1996