General Hospital Psychiatry
Volume 21, Issue 4 , Pages 239-248, July 1999

Captive patients, captive doctors: clinical dilemmas and interventions in caring for patients in managed health care

This paper is based in part on two presentations by Dr. Bursztajn: “Medical Historical Perspectives Regarding Managed Care and Medical Necessity: True and False” (American Psychiatric Association Annual Meeting, San Diego, CA, May 19, 1997); “Medical Necessity, Managed Health Care Denial of Benefits, and the Nuremberg Code” (Princeton University 250th Anniversary Symposium, Princeton, NJ, May 29, 1997).

  • Harold J Bursztajn, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress reprint requests to: Harold J. Bursztajn, M.D., 96 Larchwood Drive, Cambridge, MA 02138
  • ,
  • Archie Brodsky, B.A.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA

Abstract 

This article explores common clinical dynamics resulting from the denial of choice that many patients experience in managed health care and proposes clinical adaptations for the treating or consulting psychiatrist. Patients who feel they have been denied the right to choose their health plan, treatment setting, or personal physician commonly go through a subjective experience analogous to that of being held captive. This sense of captivity can exacerbate the feelings of helplessness and hopelessness brought on by serious illness. It can also intensify the patient’s feelings of alienation and betrayal when managed care constrains patient-physician decision making by limiting treatment options. These dynamics can lead to identifiable transference reactions and, in turn, to physician countertransference. Psychiatrists can do much to ameliorate these potentially destructive dynamics both as treating therapists and as consultants to general physicians. Indications for consultation or intervention are analyzed and specific clinical strategies to enhance the patient’s decision-making capacity throughout the introductory, ongoing, and termination phases of the treatment alliance are reviewed.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0163-8343(99)00014-6

General Hospital Psychiatry
Volume 21, Issue 4 , Pages 239-248, July 1999